Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Why Choose A Separation Agreement Instead of Filing for Divorce Right Away?

Here’s the short answer to the above question:  a Separation Agreement is the best remedy for a couple that does not want to get divorced right away but rather wants to begin living separate lives. In my 16+ years of practicing law & working in this extremely tricky & emotionally charged field of law, I’ve learned many lessons about divorce & Family Court practice, but none more important than the following:   each & every divorce & Family Court case comes with a unique set of personalities, different number of children (or no children), different levels & types of emotions including abandonment, jealousy, self-pity, scorn, anger, selfishness & sometimes revenge as well.  In my opinion, all of the above emphasizes the fact that each & every divorce (& Family Court) case requires that the lawyer work hard to achieve a unique situation for that particular case. You’ll never see a client blow up his/her own house (just to prevent the other party from getting his/her equitable share of that asset) in the areas of personal injury/accident cases, Immigration law, worker’s comp., medical malpractice, or any other area of law, trust me.

For an article like this, a lawyer always has to include the following required language:   prior results Do Not guarantee a similar outcome in the future. There’s no doubt that my comments may be construed as legal advice, but my thoughts are just expressions of my opinion based upon my having worked hard in these 2 very difficult areas of law for years.

So if a couple wants to begin living separately without getting divorced, why not just live apart (or even under the same roof) without actually signing a written agreement? Far & away the #1 reason I’ve seen is so that one spouse can continue enjoying medical coverage (dental, optical, etc.) under the other spouse’s plan. This coverage will continue until the document called the Judgment of Divorce has been signed by the Court. In fact, once a divorce case has been filed in any county in NY State (regardless of where the husband & wife currently live, if they live together or if one spouse has already moved out), you’ll find that many employers’ Personnel Depts./Dept. of Human Resources will refuse to allow a married employee to remove his/her spouse from the current medical plan or even to allow that employee to decrease the level of coverage for his/her spouse until that employee shows proof that a Judgment of Divorce has been signed.

In NY, anytime a divorce case is filed with the Clerk of that County & served upon the defendant spouse, the ‘Notice of Automatic Orders’ advising both spouses of what I’ve just described must be attached to the Summons & Complaint (or ‘Summons with Notice,’ an alternate & quicker way to file a divorce case). The ‘Notice of Automatic Orders’ & the 2 other required pages that are required to be attached to all newly filed divorce cases (& then served upon the defendant spouse) are marked below as pages 5, 6 & 7 (see the top middle of each page). Pages 1 to 4 are the typical contents of a Separation Agreement for a couple with at least 1 child.

In NY, once both married people have signed a Separation Agreement, it must be recorded with the County Clerk just like a real estate deed, mortgage, etc. Then after 1 year (or more) has passed, either spouse can ‘convert’ the Separation Agreement into a Judgment of Divorce. This is not a 5 minute process because it requires that additional paperwork be typed out with the correct information & properly filed with the Court, Almost the exact same paperwork that is required if either spouse had decided to file for divorce immediately instead of opting for the Separation Agreement option. My opinion is that if a couple that enters into a Separation Agreement does not have a child, Yes it might be possible for that couple to convert, meaning complete, the process of divorce on their own but it can still be tricky. But for a couple that has at least 1 child, my opinion is that it will be very difficult for either spouse to convert the Separation Agreement correctly so that a Judgment of Divorce can be signed by the Court without any delays. Let me explain why:

Perhaps the largest disadvantage of entering into a Separation Agreement is that the Supreme Court (the only Court in NY that can sign a Judgment of Divorce) does not review the Separation Agreement. In fact, No Judge/Referee from the Supreme Court even flips open 1 page in any Separation Agreement that is recorded with the County Clerk. Therefore, at least 1 year later (or more) when 1 of the spouses wants to obtain a Judgment of Divorce based on that Separation Agreement, only then does a Judge/Referee from the Supreme Ct. get the chance to review the contents of the Agreement, referring to the topics of equitable distribution, custody & visitation a/k/a parenting time, child support, life insurance for the child(ren) in case the non-custodial parent dies, the topic of emancipation all need be addressed. Then there are even Discretionary Topics that can be resolved when at least 1 unemancipated child is involved such as the ‘add-on’ expenses (summer camp, music lessons, tutoring, etc.) & other topics. I believe that even the most experienced divorce lawyers will tell you that the process of First, getting the spouses to agree on each of these topics and then Second, reducing the parties’ understanding on each topic to individually written provisions will always be an extremely difficult process.

In NY, there is no such thing as ‘suing your spouse’ for a Separation Agreement; no such case law or statute exists to achieve this. But it is true that in some rare situations, 1 of the spouses will file a divorce case but the parties will end up discontinuing the divorce case so that they can enter into a Separation Agreement. This re-emphasizes the obvious truth that entering into a Separation Agreement is 100% voluntary & cannot be forced.

In NY, the only document that officially ends the bonds of marriage is called the Judgment of Divorce, meaning that no other document in NY can officially end a marriage. A Separation Agreement does not officially end a marriage. Even the signing of the traditional written agreement After a typical divorce case has been filed (the ‘Stipulation of Settlement,’ not a Separation Agreement) does not end the marriage. In my years of practice, I’ve learned to Not use the term ‘unofficial end to a marriage’ because it just does not make sense to me. Some married people stop living together & cease all communication years & years before 1 of them finally files for divorce, so I’ve learned that a divorce case is over only when the Judgment of Divorce is signed & not 1 day before. (No document issued by the NYS Family Court can dissolve a marriage.)  

Since Separation Agreements are the exception, not the rule, between 2 married people who want to separate, they require a high level of cooperation, meaning that both parties should respect each other & be amicable during the negotiation & writing-out process. I’ve never finalized a Separation Agreement when there has been a discernable amount of hostility & tension between the spouses. It makes the process of achieving a well-written Separation Agreement all the more difficult because neither spouse nor his/her lawyer can seek Court intervention for a Separation Agreement.

Generally speaking, the attorney fees for the prep. of a Separation Agreement are much lower than those associated with the full-blown divorce process. Regarding the issue of how much time the process will take before both people finally sign it, I’ll say that in general terms, the process goes faster than the typical contested divorce process. But I’ve also seen spouses argue & bicker for months over the small details before the final version of the Separation Agreement is signed.

For example, if the 2 spouses sign a Separation Agreement (notarized as well) & the Separation Agreement is recorded, just like a Deed, on May 1, 2015, both spouses are required to wait until at least May 1, 2016 before either spouse can ‘convert’ it into a Judgment of Divorce. Once the entire ‘uncontested divorce packet’ (including the not-yet signed Judgment of Divorce) is filed with the Court, the delays for the processing time are different for each county/borough in NY. Even this topic requires a separate article, which is another reason why this area of law is so difficult & frequently not handled very well.


Getting Divorced Right Away
New York was the very last state to join the other 49 states in enacting ‘no-fault’ divorce. On Oct. 12, 2010, NY enacted a new prong (‘subsection 7’) to the statute known as Domestic Relations Sec. 170. Now in NY so long as a couple has been married at least six (6) months, either spouse can swear/affirm that so long as he/she believes that the marital relationship has ‘irretrievably broken down for at least six (6) months,’ if & only if that the spouse who files the divorce case has met the jurisdictional (‘residency’) requirements, that spouse will eventually obtain a Judgment of Divorce against the spouse. What is important to remember is that this new prong (NY DRL Sec. 170(7)) was intentionally written as a Subjective Test, meaning that so long as the spouse who files for divorce believes, in good faith, that the marriage has ‘irretrievably broken down for 6 months or more, it will be virtually impossible for the defendant spouse to defeat this cause of action so that he/she can preserve the marriage. YES it is true that prior to Oct. 2010, in rare situations a spouse who had been sued for divorce would hire a lawyer to try to get the entire divorce case dismissed. I did some research for the time period Oct. 2010 to early 2016 but I wasn’t able to find 1 successful defeat of a divorce case (by a defendant spouse) when the divorce case was filed based upon DRL 170(7).

In NY, the spouse that files a divorce case is called the plaintiff and it will cost that spouse $210 to file the divorce case (to purchase the index number). Then in NY, once a new divorce case is filed, the plaintiff or his/her lawyer has 120 calendar days (meaning including holidays & weekends) to have the defendant spouse served in person. In the first 30 days, as a force of habit I normally contact the defendant spouse on my own in order to avoid the use of a process server. Nobody wants to be served in person, by a process server, at the job or out in the public; it is a highly embarrassing & upsetting experience. But after the 1st month if I see that the defendant spouse refuses to contact me or do anything, at that point I normally use my process server to deliver the documents.

I have much more to write about the divorce process in NY, but I realize that this article is getting very long. I hope that you’ve found this information helpful or at least interesting to read about. It’s my opinion that the areas of divorces (contested & uncontested) & the closely related area of Family Court practice are, by far, the most difficult & challenging areas of law that I’ve ever worked in. Even my high school friend whose divorce case I handled put it like this:  ‘if the lawyer gets 1 word wrong in the Agreement, he can be sued.’ And that is 1000% true.

Thank you for reading this material & I hope that you’ve found this Article to be helpful & interesting! The information & materials you see here have been prepared by The Law Office of Henry Lung, PC for general informational purposes only. None of the contents of this Article should be considered to constitute legal advice or a legal opinion.
Therefore, The Law Office of Henry Lung, PC cannot make any representation or warranty regarding any of the information contained in this Article. You should not rely or act upon any information provided in this Article without first consulting with an experienced lawyer. It goes without saying that I must disclaim any responsibility in connection with any actions that someone decides based upon your reliance upon any portion of this Article.
If you have commentary about any portion of this Article, feel free to email me at HenryLungPC@gmail.com or call me at (888) 539-2015 / (516) 248-8253.















Wednesday, June 22, 2016

A Miracle Outcome For A Speeding Ticket That Is Also An Example Of A Judge's Belief in Leniency & Second Chances:

Last week in Court, I represented a young, reckless man who is now the beneficiary of a miracle, the kind of miracle that hopefully will push him to get his life on track and not kill himself speeding ever again at over 100 miles/hour. Earlier this year, he was stopped for driving at One Hundred Eight (108) miles an hour on the highway (55 mph limit). First, the judge screamed at him and said that at that high rate of speed, he’s seen pictures of victims in those car crashes whose skin has fallen off their bodies. Then the judge lectured him at length and asked this young man if he wanted to enlist in the Marines. Then the case was recalled 2 times because the judge was not happy with my client’s answers. But finally the judge issued the following ruling: if and only if this young man stays out of trouble and is not issued any new moving and parking violations for the next 6 months, this ‘speeding 108 mph in a 55 mph zone’ ticket will be dismissed in its entirety when we go back to Court in mid-Dec. In my 16 years of practicing law and slogging through extremely difficult contested divorce cases, Family Court cases, representing criminal defendants before a grand jury in various felony cases, and finally trials in criminal cases involving juries (felonies and misdemeanors), I can tell you that this kind of ‘commitment’ from a Judge for this kind of obnoxious and highly dangerous behavior is as close to a miracle outcome as any that I’ve ever personally been involved in during my years of practicing law. I also had very little to do with this wonderful outcome, even if you feel that this post is about me, which it is not. This post is about the generosity, patience and kindness of a Judge who has a reputation of being very hard on ‘recidivist’ drivers, especially young kids who speed so fast that, if they crashed, the crash would most likely have killed the driver and all passengers on impact.
My client is a 20 year New Yorker of Italian-American background who does not live or work in the county where he was stopped for this high speed, meaning that he basically assured himself that any Judge would come down on him harder than if he lived or worked in that county. At 20 years old, my client already has a driving record that is several pages long and recently, he pled guilty to ‘driving while ability impaired’ (DWAI) and he’s not even 21 yet. He was also pulled over for an entirely new and unrelated moving violation (not speeding) after he got this speeding ticket. When we went to Court last week, the case was scheduled for trial and the Judge had every right to insist that the trial go forward. If convicted, this young man could have been sentenced to jail for up to 30 days, apart from having to pay a max. possible fine of $600. Also, the judge was ready to suspend his driving privileges for 90 days, what is commonly called a 'VTL 510 suspension.'
Speeding tickets are very difficult to beat because the speed of the driver is generally measured by a properly calibrated laser gun. In the practice of law, you’ll often hear lawyers promise that they will achieve this kind of result for you, that result, etc. Some people in the general public believe that by hiring a lawyer for a criminal case or for traffic tickets, their lawyer can get the entire case and/or traffic tickets dismissed. This type of belief is highly misleading and not really based upon any hard facts of ‘frequent dismissals’ and/or ‘frequent acquittals.’ If the criminal and moving/parking violations system in the US really functioned in this way, we would have mass disorder all over the place (more so than we already have) and you would have heard about these magical, almost mythical lawyers by now.
Getting back to my client’s case, the original plea bargain that the prosecutor offered my client was a reduction down to speeding 88 miles in a 55 mph zone, which carries 8 points. My client’s driving record was so bad that after his parents hired me, I urged them to have their son take Defensive Driving, which he did before we went to Court last week. Therefore, the ‘up to 4 point removal’ benefit that the Defensive Driving course offers to all drivers who are licensed in NY was no longer available to him. Defensive Driving can be taken as often as you like, but the ‘up to 4 point removal’ benefit can only benefit a driver 1 time for every 18 months. On the 3 page attachment below, you can see at the top of p. 2 that he took Defensive Driving in March, 2016 and on the same page (under ‘Tickets’), you will see the 108/55 ticket. Above it you will see the latest ticket that he was issued in Apr. 2016 for disobeying a traffic control device (2 points if he is convicted).
You can do your own survey of lawyers who handle traffic tickets, but this type of outcome for an above-100 miles per hour ticket is extremely rare. It was simply a great act of generosity and patience towards my client by a very forgiving judge. I do not believe that I will ever be personally involved in this type of outcome ever again. When I returned to my office after Court was over, I told another client (who was waiting for me) about this judge's kindness and this other client of mine said that when he was stopped for driving at almost 100 mph in his 20s, he did not get a reduction at all and got 11 points on his record immediately. Back to my client from last week, he was not granted an ‘adjournment in contemplation of dismissal’ (ACOD) because in NY, although some types of moving violations are classified as crimes (mostly misdemeanors), a very high speeding ticket such as this is Not a crime, he was not fingerprinted, etc. Also when a client is granted an ACOD, the client/defendant does not have to return to Court in 6 months’ time after the last court appearance. However, my client for this high speeding ticket does have to go back to Court in 6 months’ time to show the Judge that he has not been issued any new tickets. If he is able to do that, his ticket will be dismissed immediately, NO community service and NO fine to be paid. An ACOD/ACD, in comparison, does not work this way.
This is a wonderful example of how the legal system, as represented by 1 Judge, can give a rebellious, out-of-control young man a second chance and maybe even shock him into getting his life back on track. I would not be surprised if that is exactly what will happen. In situations like this, I’ve observed that a client will often thank his/her lawyer endlessly and view the lawyer as a hero. But the truth is that sometimes, the lawyer has very little to do with how the Judge decides to handle the case.
There is no guarantee that either I or any other traffic ticket/criminal defense lawyer can obtain this same type of result in your case or in any other case, but it goes without saying that at least 50% of so many victories in life are due to just showing up, working hard and trying our best and fighting until the very end.




Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Domestic Violence Cases (Not Just in New York But in General) and How These Cases Intersect with Criminal Court, Family Court and Sometimes ‘Divorce Court’


                        A recent NY Post article involving a former Victoria Secret’s model (March 28, 2016, see p. 3) gives me the chance to discuss the very broad topic of ‘domestic violence’ cases but also other issues that arise from these types of situations. In fact, the topic of domestic violence is so broad that the very same fact pattern from a domestic violence case can be litigated, in NY, by those very same parties in more than 1 Court and all at the very same time. This article focuses primarily on the NY State court system but I assure you that other states have basically the same court system and utilize the same principles. To try to impress anyone who reads this article and already knows about criminal law, I am going to discuss some basics of criminal law, Family Court practice including Orders of Protection, and how divorce cases can also provide a litigant with a separate Order of Protection, all in this same article.
 
                        The Post article describes a case that took place in the Criminal Court in
downtown Manhattan, which is officially known as ‘New York County’ in the NY State court system. I tried to combine my discussion of the criminal charges involved in this case with my discussion about Orders of Protection (in general) but it got too messy, so I had to separate the 2 topics; the material on Orders of Protection follows these next paragraphs where I discuss the criminal charges from the NY Post article. Anyway, this former model allegedly flew into a rage against her then-boyfriend by repeatedly hitting him in the face, throwing his TV remote out of the window, throwing his laptop across the room, and pushing his TV off the stand, according to the ‘criminal complaint.’ Anytime you read about a person who is accused of having intentionally damaged and/or destroyed property belonging to another person without that person’s consent, it’s virtually guaranteed that the defendant will be charged with some degree of ‘criminal mischief.’ Nowhere in the Post’s article did it say what exact degree of criminal mischief this woman was charged with. Only at the very end of the article is it stated that the total value of the property that was damaged was $2,951. Based on this amount, I’m pretty sure that she was charged with criminal mischief in the 2nd degree, which is a D felony.
 
This case was definitely a ‘domestic violence’ situation and it resulted in the
filing of criminal charges against this woman. But if her then-boyfriend did not call the police and if the police did not find out, on their own, and arrest her, the victim could have sought help from the Family Court, namely in the form of a ‘stay away’ Order of Protection (shortened to ‘O/P’) but that would have been issued on the same day that the victim filed his ‘O’ Petition seeking an Order of Protection. Also in a typical criminal case stemming from a domestic violence situation, at the arraignment this woman’s then-boyfriend would have been issued a Temporary Order of Protection (‘TOP’), most likely a ‘stay away’ TOP. Many people will tell you that Orders of Protection are not to be taken lightly, meaning that if the alleged aggressor is accused of violating it, it will trigger a new, separate criminal case where the charge of contempt of Court will be made against the accused party. If an accused party was fortunate enough to be released on her own recognizance, meaning no bail was set, for the original criminal case, but is then charged with contempt of Court, you can pretty much count on 2 things:  A) the accused will be forcibly arrested either at home or place of employment;  and B) some amount of bail will be set by the Court at the arraignment.
 
                        In NY, the Family Court and the Criminal Court are each entitled to issue an Order of Protection to a litigant, even if it’s for the same litigant and lasting for basically the same period of time. The standard O/P that the general public is used to is a ‘stay away,’ meaning that the accused must stay away from the victim at all times, the accused cannot contact the victim’ directly or through a 3rd party, etc. In the Criminal Court, these Temporary Orders of Protection, well over 90% of the time, command the defendant to stay away from the victim. But if the exact same domestic violence situation is litigated in either the Family Court or in an open divorce case, there is a realistic chance that the ‘TOP’ that the Court issues to the victim will be a ‘refrain’ TOP which is the other type of Order of Protection that permits the parties to be in each other’s physical presence, meaning they can live together, eat together, complain about the economy together, etc., so long as the alleged aggressor refrains from engaging in abusive, harassing and damaging conduct towards the victim. In all NY Family Court cases, the party that files any type of Petition is called the petitioner and the opposing party is called the respondent (and never the ‘defendant’). But in a divorce case, the person who files the case is called the plaintiff and the other spouse is called the defendant.
 
                        Getting back to the Post’s article, let’s say that besides not stating the exact degree of the criminal mischief crime that was charged, assume that the article also did not state the total value of the personal property that was damaged. So long as the combined value of the items that were damaged (the TV, the remote, laptop, and other items) was more than $250 dollars but did not exceed $1,000, this woman would have been charged with criminal mischief in the 3rd degree (NY Penal Law Sec. 145.05). There are 2 prongs of the crime of criminal mischief in the 3rd degree and since the 1st prong addresses the intentional damaging/ destruction of a motor vehicle, I will not discuss it. Nevertheless, if you know of someone in NY who was accused of intentionally damaging and/or destroying a motor vehicle, 3rd degree crim. mischief is an E felony, punishable by up to 4 years’ jail time. But what most of the general public does not know is that when criminal charges are discussed in the media, the maximum jail sentence that is mentioned normally is imposed only if the accused party goes to trial and then loses. Even then, there are so many situations where the defendant gets less than the max. jail time.
 
                        Returning to the crime of criminal mischief in NY, the 2nd prong of criminal mischief in the 3rd degree is very simple and states as follows:   ‘[a] person is guilty of criminal mischief in the 3rd degree when, with intent to damage property of another person, and having no right to do so nor any reasonable ground to believe that he or she has such right, he or she (2) damages property of another person in an amount exceeding $250.’ Again, this is an E felony and it is an amazingly simple crime:  go and intentionally break a person’s flat screen TV, car windshield, drone, new bike, and chances are you have committed an E felony. Now compare criminal mischief in the 3rd degree with the next-highest degree, that being the 2nd degree of criminal mischief: 
                       
                        In NY, the only difference between the 3rd degree and 2nd degree of criminal mischief is the total value of the property that was damaged. The entire definition of the 2nd degree of this crime is exactly the same as the 3rd degree, with the only exception that instead of the words ‘in an amount exceeding $250’ (see the previous paragraph), the words ‘in an amount exceeding $1,500’ is how the crime of crim. mischief in the 2nd degree is defined here in NY. Second degree criminal mischief is a D felony and is punishable by up to 7 years in jail which, once again, is rarely ordered by the judge. I am using the word ‘rarely’ as a term of art but in order to be sentenced to the max of 7 years for being found guilty of this crime, you not only have to lose the trial but the accused, in all likelihood, has to have prior criminal convictions. It is a basic principle of criminal law, personal injury, politics, and life in general that the closer you are to the city (Any city in the US), the more lenient the court system will be. For this simple reason, you’ll see that even if a car accident or other type of personal injury case takes place in the suburbs, the plaintiff’s lawyers will always try to file the lawsuit in the very liberal, meaning plaintiff-friendly, boroughs of the Bronx, Queens, Brooklyn a/k/a Kings County and sometimes in Manhattan (NY County). But somehow, Staten Is. a/k/a Richmond County does not qualify as a ‘liberal’ jurisdiction. Any place where a large number of Republicans live and work is normally not viewed as ‘liberal’ and this is just one of the truths of living in America.
 
I know that if I were not a lawyer and had no knowledge about the legal system or
if I had a child who was charged with a felony (such as crim. mischief in the 3rd or 2nd degree), this would scare the daylights out of me. This type of fear is what often causes people to take drastic measures, such as grossly overpaying for a defense lawyer or hiring the very first lawyer that they speak to. In NY, the crime of criminal mischief is separated into 4 separate degrees and the differences are essentially based on the value of the damaged property. Similarly, in NY the crime of larceny is also separated into 5 degrees (the lowest being petty larceny a/k/a shoplifting) and like criminal mischief, the 5 degrees of larceny are based on the total value of the property that is alleged to be stolen and/or misappropriated.
 
                        In this case involving the former Victoria’s Secret model, thankfully nobody died or was seriously injured. The article’s last paragraph states that, ‘[u]nder the deal, [the defendant] agreed to pay [the ex-boyfriend] $2,951 for his ruined electronics, and in return, if she keeps out of trouble for 6 months, her record will be wiped clean.’ In NY, anytime you see the words ‘if he/she keeps out trouble for 6 months,’ you’ll know that the case was resolved by an ‘ACOD,’ shortened for the term ‘adjournment in contemplation of dismissal’ which, pursuant to the NY Crim. Procedure Law, provides that the criminal case will be dismissed not right away but rather in 6 months’ time, so long as the accused party is not rearrested for a new, unrelated crime either in NY or anywhere else (the term ‘ACOD’ is shortened to ‘ACD’ in the boroughs of NY City). This type of dismissal does not require the accused party to return to Court in 6 months’ time and does not result in a conviction going on that person’s record. But the accused party’s FBI report will always have an indication that a criminal case took place. The only way to erase the actual arrest is to have the arrest voided (this is different from just having the final disposition of the criminal case ‘sealed’) and it is extremely difficult to have a person’s arrest voided. The police and/or District Attorney’s office has to conclude that the arrest should never have happened in the first place. If you notice, in our legal system in America when a defendant wins a trial, the jury (or the judge, in a bench trial) never finds the accused to be innocent. The best outcome that a defendant can hope for, after a trial, is a finding of not guilty. For most people, there is a huge difference between the term ‘not guilty’ and the term ‘innocent’ and I understand this completely.
 
                        This former model in the Post’s article received an ACD, despite being charged with at least 1 felony (crim. mischief in the 2nd degree, a D felony). This goes to show you that in some situations, a person can be charged with a felony but yet still escape with a dismissal, albeit a delayed type of dismissal. In the City of NY, for criminal cases that are basically tantamount to nuisance crimes (loitering, urinating in public, drinking an open container of alcohol in public, etc.), I’ve seen the ACD period shortened from 6 months to just 24 hours. But an ACD often comes with the issuance of a final Order of Protection that, in a domestic violence situation, normally lasts for 12 months from the last day of Court, referring to the day that the defendant is sentenced. The victim in a case like the one described in the Post article (meaning her now ex-boyfriend) would have to vigorously push the DA’s office in order for the Court to not issue a final Order of Protection at all or for it to be changed to a ‘refrain’ O/P that would allow the defendant and the victim to be in each other’s physical presence.
 
The $2,951 amount that the woman in the NY Post article paid is normally
referred to as restitution. Remember that this case took place in the relatively liberal criminal court in New York County where a D felony was disposed via an ACD. In the suburbs, the probability is that for the exact same fact pattern that lead to the same crimes being charged, a defendant who is a former model might not obtain an ACD. In order to obtain that kind of outcome a/k/a disposition, your defense lawyer will have to perform some magic that is too extensive for me to explain here.
 
Orders of Protection
 
The actions that the woman from the NY Post article gave rise to the filing of criminal charges against her. But in many situations, a person’s actions do not rise to the level of any single crime, so the Criminal Court does not get involved at all, meaning no Temporary Order of Protection is ever issued from that Court. Nevertheless, there are many examples of obnoxious, irritating and even dangerous behavior, in domestic situations, that cause the supposed ‘victim’ to want to seek court intervention. In fact, it’s not uncommon for both people in a romantic, domestic or familial relationship to want to seek official protection from the Court, in the form of an Order of Protection.
 
                        A very common example of a ‘non-crime’ that causes many people to seek an Order of Protection not from the Crim. Court but rather from Family Court is excessive drinking; if the drinking is done in the presence of the parties’ child(ren), the Court might even commence a Neglect case against that parent. The Criminal Court will have nothing to do with this type of fact pattern because in the US, a person can drink excessively and so long as he/she does not a motor vehicle (as defined by the NY Vehicle & Traffic Law) or commit any other crime, the excessive drinking itself is definitely not a crime. But the Family Court can get involved by issuing either a ‘refrain’ Order of Protection (ordering the respondent to not drink, either excessively or at all, in the presence of the petitioner and the child(ren). If the fact pattern shows that the case has extreme aspects to it, the Court might issue a ‘stay away’ O/P.
 
In NY, there is no statute stating that any litigant is entitled to possess only 1
Order of Protection at any one given point in time. I currently have a domestic violence situation right now wherein the wife filed an ‘O’ Petition in the Family Court. The judge granted her a Temporary Order of Protection that was only a ‘refrain,’ thereby allowing the respondent husband to remain in the marital residence. But then the police somehow (I am using this term somewhat sarcastically) learned about this situation and asked whether she wanted to file a criminal complaint against her own husband. She said yes, despite not reading English at all, and when the police wrote out a short criminal Affidavit and the wife signed it, her husband was arrested, booked and brought to Criminal Court to be arraigned. But the most frustrating aspect of this domestic violence situation is that the ‘TOP’ that the Criminal Court judge issued at the arraignment is a full ‘stay away’ that only allows the defendant father to have parenting time with their children pursuant to an Order from either the Family Court or the Supreme Court (if they had already filed a divorce case, which they have not yet).
 
                     In NY, the Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction to issue a Judgment of Divorce, meaning that this is the only Court that can deem a married couple to be divorced (in NY, there is no ‘common law marriage’ but if a couple is here from another state where the institution of ‘common law’ marriage is recognized, there is case law stating that the couple will be deemed to be a married couple in NY). Many people do not know that the NYS Family Court has concurrent jurisdiction with our Supreme Court, meaning that all the issues that are litigated in a typical contested divorce case (in Supreme Court) can instead be litigated in the Family Court. Of course, well over 95% of the general public who are contemplating divorce, currently going through a divorce, or who are already divorced would not have any idea of this. If you want to know why, I’ll be happy to tell you why, just email me at HenryLungPC@gmail.com or call the office at (516) 248-8253 or (888) 539-2015.
                       
I happen to practice regularly in all of these 3 areas of law that I’ve discussed in
this article (criminal defense law, Family Court practice, and divorce law a/k/a matrimonial law which is a misnomer because there is nothing ‘matrimonial’ about handling a divorce). I have seen a litigant up to 2 separate Orders of Protection at the same time but never 3, which is nevertheless still possible. But to have 3 open and active cases going on at the same time, at least 1 of those litigants will be missing many days of work and/or school. In NY, if this happens to take place, nobody from any of the Courts that issued the Orders of Protection will check up with the other Court(s) to find out if the victim only needs 1 Order of Protection. Unfortunately, that is not how our legal system works.
 
Unless the alleged aggressor a/k/a bad person takes the proper steps to have the
TOP or multiple TOPs rescinded, all of them will stay in place (generally speaking) and even remain in effect after the underlying case (Family Court case, Criminal case and/or divorce case) is over. I always say that Orders of Protection are very similar to mechanic’s liens and Notices of Pendency a/k/a lis pendens in this way:   very easy to file and obtain from the Court but a royal headache to get removed or rescinded.
 
                        If you have read up to this point, I thank you for taking the time to read this material. I have practiced law very intensely for the past 16 years and I know what I am doing. I have to include the standard disclaimer language, as follows:  the information contained in this Article have been prepared by The Law Office of Henry Lung, PC for general informational purposes only. None of the contents of this Article should be considered to constitute legal advice or a legal opinion. Therefore, The Law Office of Henry Lung, PC cannot make any representation or warranty regarding any of the information contained in this Article. The descriptions of the cases that I have handled in the past should not be interpreted as any form of guarantee or promise that I can produce the same results in your case. But I guarantee you that the descriptions of my prior cases, including the final results, are accurate and I say with pride that these clients were very satisfied with how I handled their cases.

                      You should not rely or act upon any information provided in this Article without first consulting with me or an experienced lawyer of your choosing. It goes without saying that I must disclaim any responsibility in connection with any actions that someone might take that are based upon what he/she has read in this Article.
I can be reached at HenryLungPC@gmail.com or call me at (516) 248-8253 / (888) 539-2015. 









Tuesday, April 5, 2016

I Was Featured on a Segment on 'Help Me Howard': Howard investigates private investigators accused of keeping their client’s cash

In Jan. 2016, I was interviewed by the ‘Help Me Howard’ program which is featured on Channel 11 news (at night). This interview was shown on a Fri. night in Jan. probably on 1/22. Howard interviewed me about a NY debt collection firm that I used to assist in collecting Judgments in NY. This process is sometimes called ‘Judgment enforcement’ or ‘Judgment execution.’ Once a creditor is awarded a Judgment from any Court, even outside of NY, the debtor/defendant can still refuse to pay it. Then instead of the creditor/plaintiff using the Sheriff’s Office (in the suburbs) or the NYC Marshal’s Office in New York City, the plaintiff/creditor can hire an aggressive debt collection lawyer like me to actually collect upon their Judgment, meaning convert it into $$$. A money Judgment is just a piece of paper from Court and if you have a Judgment, you’ll quickly see that it is of no use for paying any bills.


In this interview, I explain how this particular debt collection firm that I used to assist (but thankfully no more) admitted to me that after successfully collecting a Judgment for 1 of their clients, the company actually used the money for themselves instead of sending the proceeds (the amount of the Judgment) to their own client. I had nothing to do with this transaction, they did it on their own. What they did is nothing less than stealing, it is totally wrong, and when that client complained to the ‘Help Me Howard’ show, I said that I confronted this debt collection firm on my own before he contacted me and told them that they had stolen money and had committed ‘grand larceny in the 4th degree,’ which in NY is an E felony. When the Help Me Howard program contacted me, I immediately agreed to be interviewed about this colossal mess. 

PLEASE CHECK OUT THE LINK BELOW 

Friday, April 1, 2016

Have a Safe Weekend

If you find yourself in this situation, I handle these type of cases in all of lower NYS. Please feel free to call my office @ (516) 248-8253 or send me an email @ HenryLungPC@gmail.com. 

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

About Attorney Henry Lung (NY) by Client John D.

False Advertising

I saw this billboard somewhere in Valley Stream 2 weeks ago (see below) and I can't stress how misleading it is. Unfortunately, there is no law in NY that permits a lay person (or the govt., for that matter) to take down a billboard that contains grossly misleading information.
In NY, the total for all filing fees ('court costs') for a divorce comes to $370 (and possibly $5 to $15 more for a Certified version of the Judgment of Divorce, which is the only document that can officially end a marriage). Since a divorce case is a civil case that must be filed in the NY Supreme Court, the initial fee to commence the case (meaning to purchase an index number for your case) is $210. I have seen some plaintiffs try to get a waiver of the filing fees (to proceed 'in forma pauperis,' meaning as a poor person), but I don't know how successful those Motions are. But you can't hire a private lawyer and then seek to have the court fees waived, that is not going to work.
Then the total of all the remaining filing fees, to be paid later in the divorce, are $160: $95 for the 'Request for Judicial Intervention' aka 'RJI,' then $30 for the 'Note of Issue' and finally $35 if both parties have signed a divorce agreement which is called a 'Stipulation of Settlement' in NY. I've noticed that anywhere from 95% to 99% of all divorces wind up being settled with this type of written agreement, even if at the start 1 of the spouses swears to pummel the other spouse with 'I'll never pay you a dime,' 'I'd rather spend/give all my money to my lawyer instead of paying you a penny' and other charming statements like this.
I have heard the above statements and their more vulgar variations many times but have resolved all of those divorce cases. There is a huge amount of 'windbagging' in contested divorce and Family Court cases and it often comes from the lawyers themselves. One very important lesson I've learned from working on contested divorce cases and nasty Family Court cases is that when one party (or both) finally run out of money and/or get tired of losing time from work is when these cases finally reach a settlement and are done.
Contested divorce and Family Court cases are chock full of dealing with emotions. After 15 tough years of dealing with other divorce lawyers, many of whom are head cases, not to mention representing clients of my own who have had their divorce cases 'cut up' into pieces by their first/second/third lawyer, I have learned that in America, divorce cases are basically about TWO THINGS: EMOTIONS AND MONEY (in the various forms that it is sought after in these cases).
In some divorce cases, each party will sign the Stipulation of Settlement right away; in other cases, it is signed in the first 6 months. For some others, the Stip. of Settlement is signed in the first year, others in the 2nd year, and still others it is signed on the eve of trial, during the trial, after the trial, and even while the case is on appeal After the judge has already rendered a written 'Decision After Trial.' The court system gives these Stipulations of Settlement much weight and unless one spouse can prove that he/she was forced to sign the Stip. of Settlement under 'duress' or if that spouse can prove that he/she had no idea what he/she was signing ('mistake' they call it), it will be virtually impossible to convince the court to undo/rescind/reopen the Stip. of Settlement. Therefore, a married person better watch out what they are signing and fully understand all the terms, conditions and obligations. A failure to fully understand everything happens as often with American born clients as it does with people who did not grow up in the US.
It is also true that many divorce lawyers, even those with years of experience, will use 'pressure tactics' (this is a nice way of saying they twist their OWN clients' arms) to sign the Stip. of Settlement. I'm sure that many judges are aware of, since almost all judges used to be practicing lawyers, but I have seen that they often look the other way. In many counties/boroughs when each party is represented by a lawyer, the judge Will Not 'allocute' the parties after a Stip. of Settlement has been signed. In contrast, in all criminal cases when the person pleads guilty, the judge is required to ask various questions such as 'are you pleading guilty because you are in fact guilty,' ' have you had enough time to discuss this case with your lawyer' and 'are you satisfied with the services of your lawyer,' etc. But in many counties and boroughs in NY, in a divorce case after a Stip. of Settlement has been signed, many judges do not conduct an allocution, meaning that the clients who signed the Stip. of Settlement will never appear before a judge and be made to answer these above questions on the record.
In addition, so often I've seen in both criminal and divorce cases where 1 party is so scared (or stressed out, ran out of money, confused, angry, or a combination of these) that when he/she is being 'allocuted' by the judge, that person answers Yes to the question 'did you sign this agreement freely and voluntarily' and Yes to the question 'are you satisfied with the services of your lawyer' and, in criminal cases, 'are you pleading guilty because you are in fact guilty.'
The lesson I've learned is that in our legal system, the judge is not there to play Detective with your case. The judges are not authorized by our legal system to conduct their own private investigation into your case. Throughout a contested divorce, Family Court and criminal cases (and others), if the client does not speak the truth or indicate that there is a problem between him/her and the lawyer, the legal system (as represented by the judge) does not intervene on its own will. I have practiced heavily in the area of contested divorces, Family Court practice and criminal defense (beginning in 2000 but working heavily in these areas of law in 2002) and it's obvious that so many currently divorced people are moderately dissatisfied to highly dissatisfied with their divorce agreements a/k/a Stipulations of Settlement. This is one of many reasons why I'll always view contested divorces as the utmost difficult area of law. A lawyer who does not work in this field of law cannot say that he/she deals with any problem that is similar to getting a panicked phone call on a Fri. afternoon saying that the other parent is late for picking up the child(ren) or a call over the weekend saying that he/she can't get in phone contact with the children who are spending time with the other parent. Nothing that I've come across in the area of criminal defense, immigration law, debt collection a/k/a commercial litigation a/k/a civil litigation, landlord-tenant law and Dept. of Labor cases comes close to this type of stress and tension and warfare.
I should wrap it up here but the portion of this billboard that says 'Spouse's Signature NOT Needed' is also not true. All divorce agreements and even an agreement from Family Court must be either signed by both parties (and notarized) or the terms must be placed 'on the record' before a judge/referee in the Court. The Only example of a divorce situation where the signature of the other spouse a/k/a the defendant is not necessary is when After the defendant spouse has been served (either in person, as required by NYS law, or via an alternate method that has been approved by the court), that defendant spouse fails to file an Answer, fails to request additional time in which to file an Answer, and fails to officially 'appear' in some other way. If and only if this happens, the plaintiff spouse has to file a Motion seeking a 'Judgment of Divorce' (On Default) but the plaintiff only has 1 year from the default committed by the defendant in order to do this. The plaintiff's lawyer does not have 3 years to file this type of Motion.
In Contrast, once a divorce case is commenced in NY, so long as the defendant spouse is served within 120 days, as required by law, and the defendant spouse 'answers' in time, if they eventually sign a Stipulation of Settlement years and years later, that Same index number will still be valid to finalize their divorce. I included this for those people who filed for divorce but then abandoned their case. Unless the divorce case is officially discontinued (costs less than $40), that index number can still be used.
Thank you for reading this article and I hope that this information helps someone. I have friends who live outside of NY but I am confident that the laws in other states governing divorces (and criminal cases) are very similar, if not exactly similar. I have to include a DISCLAIMER that prior results are not to be used as a guarantee or assurance of future outcomes from these cases, but I assure you that the information that I've discussed in this post is the 100% truth. It is also very true that other lawyers (not any of my lawyer friends on Facebook, of course) do not put such an emphasis on disseminating this crucial information to a new or potential client in the same way that I have chosen to.



Vehicle Seizure: What is Permissible and Impermissible in Downstate New York (as of Jan. 2016)

Lawyers often speak as if they know everything, but this is not true. I’ve certainly met enough people who have been given inaccurate to grossly inaccurate advice regarding contested divorces and Family Court cases. But this article has to do with the following issue: IF a leased or financed vehicle (automobile, motorcycle, scooter, boat, etc.) is behind on payments, can the vehicle be seized if found on a homeowner’s property? A few years ago, a young woman (she was not a lawyer) told me that the answer was NO. But tonight (Jan. 18, 2016), I confirmed with an expert who has worked for a private asset recovery company for over 13 years (in downstate NY) that the answer is YES.
I work in the area of debt collection, helping both individuals and businesses collect on their debts (pre-judgment and post-judgment enforcement). But the information that this asset recovery specialist told me tonight, I definitely did not know. He works for a private company, not the Sheriff’s office of either Nassau or Suffolk County and he does not work for any of the Marshal’s offices in NYC. Those offices might follow different policies. Once again, the information in this Article is accurate as of JAN. 18, 2016.
First, if a leased or financed vehicle is stored in a garage that is attached to the house, the asset recovery person cannot break open the lock to the garage door. But if the garage door is UNlocked, the door can be opened and the vehicle seized. If the garage door is open altogether, YES the vehicle can be seized.
Second, if the leased or financed vehicle is stored in a stand-alone garage (not attached to the house), the vehicle cannot be seized if the garage is enclosed by a fence with a lock that is properly engaged. But if the fence doesn’t have a lock on it or if the lock is not engaged properly, the asset vehicle specialist can open the fence. Then once that person reaches the garage door, the same restrictions from the immediate preceding paragraph above remain in effect.
**** All attempts by a vehicle seizure specialist to recover a vehicle are governed by the ‘breach of peace’ regulations (probably a part of the NY General Obligations Law (‘GOL’) or the NYCRR, but I didn’t have the time to locate the exact statute). A privately-hired vehicle seizure expert cannot call the police for assistance for merely the recovery of a vehicle. In addition, if the vehicle’s owner (or person leasing the vehicle) creates a ‘breach of the peace’ by getting in or on the vehicle and refusing to get off/out of the vehicle or lies in the street to block the flatbed/tow truck, etc., the vehicle seizure person I spoke with today said that he would have to stop immediately. The key point is that there cannot be an ‘altercation’ involved when seizing a vehicle.
Third, there are no time restrictions on the time of day that a vehicle can be seized. Unlike the laws that prevent process servers in New York State from serving process on a Sunday (or a Saturday if the person to be served is known to observe Saturdays as holy time – see NY Gen. Business Law Secs. 11 and 13), a leased or financed vehicle that is behind on payments can be seized in the dead of the night. I specifically asked if a vehicle can be seized at 4 AM and the person I spoke with said YES. (Getting back to process servers, on the days that they serve papers, they must serve during ‘reasonable times’ which generally means no earlier than 7 AM and no later than 9 PM). A process server definitely cannot serve process at 11 PM, midnight or any time after 8 PM until 7 AM.
Fourth (getting back to vehicle seizure), in New York City there are further restrictions that all private vehicle seizure companies must adhere to. If the City of New York has placed a boot on the car for unpaid parking tickets (or moving violations), a private seizure company cannot seize the vehicle, period. But if the car owner (or Lease holder) has, on his/her own, put a boot on a vehicle that is behind on payments, that vehicle can definitely be seized. Since the vehicle cannot be damaged during the seizure process, the vehicle seizure expert I spoke with said that a flatbed or ‘tow dolly’ must be used to take the vehicle away.
Fifth, in New York City, the vehicle seizure expert can enter the homeowner’s driveway. But the expert seeking to seize the vehicle cannot step beyond the ‘imaginary line’ that is marked by the mailbox, assuming the property has a mailbox that is closer to the sidewalk than the ones generally attached to the house’s outer wall. Also, in New York City only, the electric meter that is generally found on the side of a typical home creates another ‘imaginary line’ that the vehicle seizure expert cannot go past in order to recover a vehicle.
Sixth, after a vehicle is seized, the owner (or Leaseholder) has the right to pay off the unpaid payments (I’ve never seen an agreement for a financed or leased vehicle that has an ‘acceleration clause’ like the typical Mortgage and Note for a house/co-op/condo has). If the unpaid payments that led to the seizure of the financed/leased vehicle are paid even 5 minutes before that vehicle is auctioned off, the owner (or Leaseholder) can recover the vehicle itself.
I also thought that leased vehicles that were seized for non-payment were normally not auctioned off, but the vehicle seizure expert I spoke with said that leased vehicles that are seized will be auctioned off as well.
Seventh (and lastly), some banks (‘lienholders’) will honor a self-imposed moratorium from seizing vehicles that are behind on their payments, but of course those banks will never share with the general public when and for how long these moratorium(s) is/are. When the person I spoke with said this, I thought of landlord-tenant law and the moratorium (no evictions carried out) that the Sheriffs on Long Island and the Marshals in NYC honor from approx. Dec. 15 until Dec. 31 of each year. This moratorium was enacted after a family with children, from several decades ago, was shown on TV having no place to live after they were evicted a few days before Christmas. Nowadays there are generally no evictions that take place starting right after Dec. 15 of each year.
I hope that this information helps someone out! My email address is HenryLungPC@gmail.com and my address is 92 Willis Av., Mineola, NY 11501. Apart from the commentary that I’ve injected in this article, the remaining information was taken from this expert who has worked for a private vehicle seizure company, on Long Island, for the past 13 years. I first asked him this information in early Dec. (2015) and I confirmed all these details again with him today.
The following is the standard disclaimer language that you’ll find on most lawyers’ websites: the information above was compiled for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. I (Henry Lung) make no representations or warranties regarding any of the information contained in this Article. I, Henry Lung, am disclaiming any responsibility and liability in connection with any actions taken (or not taken) based upon the reader’s reliance on the content of this Article. Lastly, by providing information in this manner, I (Henry Lung) do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship of any kind with the reader. The only way that you, the reader, can become a client is by way of written agreement signed by both you and your attorney, whether your lawyer is Henry Lung or someone else.

List of Red Light Cameras in Nassau & Suffolk County

All Red Light Cameras on Long Island (as of Jan. 2016)
On Mon., Jan. 18, 2016 (yes, on MLK Jr. Day), a red light camera was cut down (or vandalized) in Coram, NY. So far, no one has been charged or arrested.
This news story inspired me to compile this list of all the Red Light Cameras on Long Island (that I could find) in both Nassau and Suffolk. This list is accurate as of Jan. 2016:
Nassau County:
Baldwin
1. Atlantic Avenue and Grand Avenue, Baldwin, 11510
Bellmore
2. Bellmore Avenue and Merrick Road, Bellmore, NY 11710
3. Bellmore Avenue and Newbridge Road, North Bellmore, NY
4. Merrick Road and Newbridge Road, Bellmore, NY 11710
Bethpage
5. Central Avenue and Stewart Avenue, Bethpage, NY 11714
Cedarhurst
6. Peninsula Boulevard and Rockaway Turnpike, Cedarhurst, NY 11516
East Meadow
7. Hempstead Bethpage Turnpike and Newbridge Road, East Meadow, NY 11554
8. Merrick Avenue and Hempstead Turnpike, East Meadow, NY 11554
9. Merrick Avenue and Stewart Avenue/Park Boulevard, East Meadow, NY 11554
East Rockaway
10. Atlantic Avenue and Ocean Avenue, East Rockaway, NY 11518
Elmont
11. Elmont Road and Linden Boulevard, Elmont, NY 11003
12. Elmont Road and Dutch Broadway, Elmont, NY 11003
Franklin Square
13. Hempstead Turnpike and New Hyde Park Road, Franklin Square, NY 11010
Freeport
14. Sunrise Avenue and Grand Avenue, Freeport, NY 11520
Garden City
15. Hempstead Turnpike and Nassau Boulevard S, Garden City South, NY 11552
16. Old Country Road and Ring Road North, East Garden City, NY 11514
17. Stewart Avenue and Endo Boulevard, Garden City, NY 11530
18. Stewart Avenue and South Street, Garden City, NY 11530
Hewlett
19. Mill Road and Peninsula Boulevard, Hewlett, NY 11557
Inwood
20. Nassau Expressway and Burnside Avenue, Inwood, NY 11096
21. Nassau Expressway and Rockaway Turnpike, Inwood, NY 10034
Island Park
22. Austin Boulevard/Empire Boulevard and Long Beach Road, Island Park, NY 11558
Levittown
23. Hempstead Turnpike and Gardiners Avenue, Levittown, NY 11756
24. Hempstead Turnpike and North Wantagh Avenue, Levittown, NY 11756
25. North Jerusalem and Wantagh Avenue, Levittown, NY 11756
Merrick
26. Merrick Road and South Merrick Avenue, Merrick, NY 11566
Mineola
27. Jericho Turnpike and Mineola Boulevard, Mineola, NY 11501
New Hyde Park
28. Jericho Turnpike and New Hyde Park Road, New Hyde Park
29. Lakeville Road and Union Turnpike, North New Hyde Park, NY 11040
30. Langdale Street and 80th Avenue, New Hyde Park
Oceanside
31. Atlantic Avenue and Lawson Boulevard, Oceanside, NY 11572
32. Atlantic Avenue and Rockaway Avenue, Oceanside, NY 11572
33. Long Beach Road and Daly Boulevard, Oceanside, NY 11572
34. Long Beach Road and Mott Street, Oceanside, NY 11572
Rockville Centre
35. Lakeview Avenue and Peninsula Boulevard, Rockville Centre, NY 11570
36. New Hyde Park Road and Union Turnpike, New Hyde Park, NY 11040
Uniondale
37. Jerusalem Avenue and Uniondale Avenue, Uniondale, NY 11553
38. Hempstead Turnpike and Uniondale Avenue, Uniondale, NY 11553
39. Charles Lindbergh Boulevard and Earle Ovington Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11553
Wantagh
40. Wantagh Avenue and Sunrise Highway, Wantagh, NY 11793
41. Jerusalem Avenue and Wantagh Avenue, Wantagh, NY 11793
42. Wantagh Avenue and Old Jerusalem Road, Wantagh, NY 11793
Woodmere
43. Peninsula Boulevard and Woodmere Blvd, Woodmere NY 11598
Town of North Hempstead
Albertson
44. I U Willets Road and Roslyn Road, Albertson, 11507
45. I U Willets Road and Willis Avenue, Albertson, 11507
Flower Hill
46. Northern Boulevard and Port Washington Boulevard, Flower Hill, NY 11576
Garden City
47. Hempstead Turnpike and Nassau Boulevard S, Garden City South, NY 11552
48. Old Country Road and Ring Road North, East Garden City, NY 11514
49. Stewart Avenue and South Street, Garden City, NY 11530
50. Stewart Avenue and Endo Boulevard, Garden City, NY 11530
Lake Success
51. Lakeville Road and Marcus Avenue, Lake Success, NY 11020
Mineola
52. Jericho Turnpike and Mineola Boulevard, Mineola, NY 11501
New Hyde Park
53. Lakeville Road and Union Turnpike, North New Hyde Park, NY 11040
54. New Hyde Park Road and Union Turnpike, New Hyde Park, NY 11040
Old Westbury
55. Guinea Woods Road/Glen Cove Road and I U Willets Road, Old Westbury, NY 11568
Westbury
56. Post Avenue/Merrick Avenue and Old Country Road, Westbury, NY 11590
57. Old Country Road & School St & Salisbury Park Drive, Westbury, NY 11590
58. Jericho Turnpike and Glen Cove Road, Westbury, NY 11590
59. Old Country Road and East Gate Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue, Westbury, NY 11590
60. Old Country Road and Ellison Avenue, Westbury, NY 11590
Town of Oyster Bay
Bethpage
61. Stewart Avenue and Central Avenue, Bethpage, NY 11714
East Massapequa
62. Unqua Road and Sunrise Highway, East Massapequa, NY 11758
Farmingdale
63. Broadhollow Road and Great Neck Road, Farmingdale, NY 11735
64. Broadhollow Road and Conklin St, Farmingdale, NY 11735
65. NY-110 and Great Neck Road, East Farmingdale, 11735
66. Route-109 and New Highway, Farmingdale, NY 11757
Greenvale
67. Northern Boulevard and Glen Cove Road, Greenvale, NY 11548
Hicksville
68. Old Country Road & South Oyster Bay Road & East Old Country Road, Hicksville/Plainview, NY 11801
69. Jerusalem Avenue and Old Country Road, Hicksville, NY 11801
70. South Broadway/Hicksville Road and Old Country Road, Hicksville, NY 11801
71. North Broadway and Nevada Street, Hicksville, NY 11801
72. Woodbury Road and South Oyster Bay Road, Hicksville, NY 11801
Jericho
73. Jericho Turnpike and Brush Hollow Road, Jericho, NY 11590
74. Jericho Turnpike & Cantiague Rock Road & Brush Hollow Road, Jericho, 11590
Massapequa
75. Merrick Road and Park Boulevard, Massapequa, NY 11758
76. Merrick Road and NY-107, Massapequa, NY 11758
77. Sunrise Highway and Park Lane, Massapequa, NY 11758
Massapequa Park
78. Merrick Road and Park Boulevard/Harbor Lane, Massapequa Park, NY 11762
Plainview
79. Old Country Road and Manetto Hill Road, Plainview, 11803
80. Old Country Road & South Oyster Bay Road & East Old Country Road, Hicksville/Plainview, NY 11801
Syosset
81. Convent Road and Jackson Avenue, Syosset
82. Jericho Turnpike and Underhill Boulevard, Syosset, NY 11791
83. South Woods Road and Syosset-Woodbury Road, Syosset, 11791
Woodbury
84. Jericho Turnpike and Woodbury Road, Woodbury, 11797
City of Long Beach
85. Lido Boulevard, Lido Beach, NY 11561 (Speed Camera)
City of Glen Cove
86. Forest Avenue and Walnut Road, Glen Cove, NY 11542
87. Forest Avenue and Dosoris Lane, Glen Cove, NY 11542
88. Brewster Street and Cottage Row, Glen Cove, NY 11542
89. Brewster Street and Forest Avenue, Glen Cove, NY 11542
Suffolk County
Town of Babylon
Copiague
1. Great Neck Road and Dixon Avenue, Copiague, NY
2. Great Neck Road and Oak Street, Copiague
Deer Park
3. Deer Park Avenue and Grand Boulevard, Deer Park, NY
Lindenhurst
4. NY-109 and Straight Path (CR-2), Lindenhurst, NY 11757
5. Route-109 and Southern State Parkway, Lindenhurst, NY 11757
6. Sunrise Highway and Country Road-2, Lindenhurst, NY 11757
7. Sunrise Highway and North Delaware Avenue, Lindenhurst, NY 11757
8. Sunrise Highway and North Monroe Avenue, Lindenhurst, NY 11757
Town of Huntington
Commack
9. Jericho Turnpike and Larkfield Road, Commack, NY 11725
10. Jericho Turnpike and Commack Road, Commack, NY 11725
11. County Road 4 and LIE South Service Road, Commack, NY
12. Commack Road and LIE North Service Road, Commack, NY 11725
Dix Hills
13. Deer Park Avenue and Straight Path, Dix Hills, NY 11746
14. South Service Road and Route 231, Dix Hills, NY 11746
15. Deer Park Avenue and LIE North Service Road, Dix Hills, NY
Huntington
16. Park Avenue and Pulaski Road, Huntington
Huntington Station
17. West Jericho Turnpike and Oakwood Road, Huntington Station, NY 11746
18. NY-110 and West Jericho Turnpike, Huntington Station, NY
19. West Jericho Turnpike and Pidgeon Hill Road, Huntington Station, NY 11746
Town of Islip
Hauppauge
20. NY-454 and Old Willets Path, Hauppauge, NY 11788
21. Route 111 and LIE South Service Road, Hauppauge, NY 11788
22. Long Island Motor Parkway and Expressway Drive North, Hauppauge, NY 11788
23. NY-454 and Long Island Motor Parkway, Hauppauge, NY 11788
Holtsville
24. Blue Point Road and Long Island Avenue, Holtsville
Islandia
25. NY-454 and E Suffolk Avenue, Islandia, NY 11749
26. Expressway Drive North and Old Nichols Road, Islandia, NY 11749
27. Expressway Drive South and Old Nichols Road, Islandia, NY 11749
Ronkonkoma
28. Ronkonkoma Avenue and Expressway Drive North, Ronkonkoma
29. Ocean Avenue and Expressway Drive South, Ronkonkoma
30. Expressway Drive South and North Ocean Avenue, Ronkonkoma
Sayville
31. Sunrise Highway and Johnson Avenue, Sayville, NY
Town of Smithtown
Commack
32. Jericho Turnpike and Larkfield Road, Commack, NY 11725
33. Jericho Turnpike and Commack Road, Commack, NY 11725
34. County Road 4 and LIE South Service Road, Commack, NY 11725
35. Commack Road and LIE North Service Road, Commack, NY 11725
Hauppauge
36. NY-454 and Old Willets Path, Hauppauge, NY 11788
37. Route 111 and LIE South Service Road, Hauppauge, NY 11788
38. Long Island Motor Parkway and Expressway Drive North, Hauppauge, NY 11788
39.. NY-454 and Long Island Motor Parkway, Hauppauge, NY 11788
Nesconset
40. NY-347 and Middle Country Road, Nesconset, NY 11767
41. Route-25 and Route-347, Nesconset, NY 11767
Town of Brookhaven
Centerreach
42. Middle Country Road and Eastwood Boulevard, Centereach, NY
43. Middle Country Road and Holbrook Road, Centereach, NY
Coram
44. Freemont Lane and Old Town Road, Coram, NY (red light and speed camera)
Holtsville
45. Blue Point Road and Long Island Avenue, Holtsville
Manorville
46. Wading River Road and South Street, Manorville, NY
Mastic Beach
47. William Floyd Parkway and Montauk Highway, Mastic Beach, NY
Port Jefferson
48. Route-347 and Route-112, Port Jefferson, NY
Ronkonkoma
49. Ronkonkoma Avenue and Expressway Drive North, Ronkonkoma
50. Ocean Avenue and Expressway Drive South, Ronkonkoma
51. Expressway Drive South and North Ocean Avenue, Ronkonkoma
Selden
52. Old Town Rd and Patchogue-Mt. Sinai Road, Selden, NY
53. Roslyn Avenue and Adirondack Drive, Selden, NY (STOP SIGN CAMERA)
54. Route-25 and Boyle Road, Selden, NY
55. Middle Country Road and Marshal Drive, Selden, NY
Stony Brook
56. Route-347 and Stony Brook Road, Stony Brook, NY